One of the issues cities across North America are grappling with (at least those that are not yet moving on progressive housing legislation, such as California’s SB 828) is the fact that, with single family home zoning, the only thing a ‘teardown’ can be replaced with is another single family home.
Mathematician, data analyst and notorious census mapper Jens von Bergmann points this out, noting that which is dominating the political landscape in Metro Vancouver these days — that when we look at single family home (SFH) development from an affordability perspective, it doesn’t look good.
And from an emissions perspective too — things look mixed at best for entire swaths of SFH neighbourhoods, all across the region. Read on >>
In Vancouver single family housing is demolished to make bigger new houses, often of the same style. Yet, in this study to be published in July by University of British Columbia researchers and MountainMath Software, the perception that new is greener and better is seriously challenged. UBC Reports notes that, “despite the better energy performance of the new homes, this cycle is likely to increase overall greenhouse gas emissions.” Read on >>
If you’ve been following the debacle in the City of Richmond over the provincially-designated Agricultural Land Reserve — and how that land is not being protected for such use — you’ve learned that municipal government can’t always be trusted to put its own, stated interests in food security and access to agricultural land ahead of the interests of a few privileged people.
The influence of developers, as they buy agricultural land cheaply and reap extraordinary profits from the building of mansions and private grounds, has spread like wildfire. Read on >>
Price Tags has been writing about the carving off of farmland to accommodate other uses seen as more immediate in Metro Vancouver.
Last Friday the Agricultural Land Commission that oversees the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) nixed the City of Abbotsford’s “Abbotsfwd” request for 200 hectares of farmland to go into “future industrial growth”. There was also a request in Langley Township to allow other uses on two blocks of farm land in Bradner. The Commission nixed that too. Read on >>
In the City of Richmond, British Columbia, where the most arable soils in Canada are supposedly protected under the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR), City Council continues to allow speculators to build houses of over 10,000 square feet on agricultural land over half an acre in size.
These mansions become exclusive gated estates, avoiding the foreign buyers tax, and are now trading at prices no farmer can afford. Delta is no better, using fertile arable land for a truck parking lot next to Highway 17, fast-tracking a casino next to the Fraser River, and using ALR lands as their industrial land piggy bank.
But it’s not just in British Columbia where politicians are fraying away agricultural land for their own in-the-moment development purposes. Read on >>
Councillor Andrea Reimer has Facebooked this:
Nine years ago today, the Greenest City Action Team made its first recommendations to Council. In the time since then we seen:
a 27% reduction in waste
32% reduction in distance driven per person
49% increase in green jobs
42% increase in local food assets
15% reduction in GHGs
more than half our residents now walk, take transit or bike.
At 3.9 T person, we have the lowest per capita emissions in North America and we’ve made longer range commitments to ensure we continue to get results on a range of green policy areas including transportation, green economic growth, zero emissions buildings, zero waste, access to nature, clean water, local food and air quality.
Questions: Do people care? Will this kind of progress even get reported, much less registered in the public mind? Have we moved on, caring more about housing to the exclusion of other agenda items? Or do we simply discount progress, focus on the failures, and generally ignore or minimize the positives even as we raise the bar for the future. Like this email that came in at the same time from Michael Alexander:
Time for Vancouver to leapfrog 50%?
San Francisco sets bold new goal: 80 percent of trips by sustainable modes
Last week, Mayor Mark Farrell announced a new goal to make 80 percent of all travel in San Francisco by a sustainable mode of transportation. That includes walking, biking, public transit, and carpooling. Having exceeded our former goal of 50 percent sustainable trips, San Francisco is well-poised to achieve this new goal—and we look forward to helping the city get there.
The new 80 percent goal supports another major pledge the Mayor made during Earth Month: committing San Francisco to become carbon neutral by 2050.
→ Learn more about San Francisco’s carbon reduction efforts.
Update: I should clarify the purpose of the post (and why I changed the title.) The Greenest City initiatives were an example of a government setting out priorities, establishing both vision and goals, and committing to a timeline. And then doing most of what it said it wanted to do – sometimes beyond the expectations of both advocates and critics. The response? As far as much of the media and public: yawn. Too often Instead: cheap cynicism. Critics are dismissive. Advocates raise the bar. Some give a quick acknowledgement and then move on – to the failures, the inadequacies, the missed opportunities. It’s as though the achievements are inconsequential or inadequate to deal with more urgent matters. This is not helpful at a time when we need positive examples and reinforcement to tackle the challenge, in particular, of climate change. The celebration of success is not unwarranted if earned; it’s essential if hope is to be maintained and continually renewed.
There’s a quiet neighbourhood street on the east side of Vancouver that explodes with two things every spring~the most extraordinary canopy of cherry blossoms, and literally hundreds of people who flock to this street to photograph the blooms-and themselves. As CTV News reported in 2017, some whacky behaviour has also begun to bloom. One neighbour noted that people tried to climb the trees and shake branches to make the petals drop; some block traffic to get the perfect selfie. City of Vancouver bylaw officers do their part by ticketing illegally parked vehicles and trying to “keep things calm”.
Price Tags is not naming the street, but we are naming the instagram account where you can see some of the cherry tree tourist antics. As Kacy Wu of Richmond News reports, Lele Chan’s Instagram account “Cherry Blossom Madness” will leave you doubled up with laughter.
You can see why some residents would choose to rope off the front of their lawns to stop ladders, vehicles, and crowds on their front lawn. In one photo, two east side felines become the centre of the attention.
All in a day on one of Vancouver’s most cherry tree’d streets.
If you really like cherry trees, you might want to take in the Vancouver Cherry Blossom Festival and all its activities until April 29, sponsored by the Vancouver Parks Board. There are also tree talks and walks, and one might just take you to the street featured on instagram with “Cherry Blossom Madness”.
What happens when Port facilities in Metro Vancouver and their associated auto processing centres are filled to capacity with automobiles? You ship European cars to Nanaimo and then barge them across to the Lower Mainland.
European cars are normally shipped to Halifax and then trucked or railed across the country. With the growing cost and scarcity of industrial land, Nanaimo is transforming into the European car depot for vehicles shipped by sea through the newly widened Panama Canal.
The president and chief executive of the Nanaimo Port Authority stated “The project has the potential to transform Canada’s import automobile supply chain.” There’s no thought of a shift to ride share autonomous vehicles in this supply model.
As Business in Vancouver reports from Carla Wilson instead of sending European cars across the Canadian continent ships will navigate directly through the Panama canal to Nanaimo. This expanded facility in Nanaimo will cost eighteen million dollars to implement and will “tackle existing transportation bottlenecks and congestion”.
This includes the repurposing of a 60,000 square foot building on 16 acres of land to be run by Western Stevedoring. There is an “assembly wharf” a paved facility of 36 acres where the cars will be prepped for shipping.
At the Nanaimo Port, cars designed to European standards get bilingual stickers and are upgraded for the Canadian market. Starting in January 2019 large carrier ships will offload 400 to 500 vehicles per vessel at the Nanaimo port.
It should also be noted that Port Metro Vancouver is one of the few in North American to not run 24 hours a day, a potential solution for real and perceived congestion and bottlenecks.
By using the Panama Canal, ships will also be able to “short ship” by delivering European vehicles to Mexico, pick up mechanical parts, and then continue to Los Angeles and Nanaimo.
Twelve thousand vehicles are expected to land in Nanaimo in 2019, with a target of 50,000 expected annually. At that point most of the vehicles will then be barged onto the mainland.
The logistics for that transshipment have not yet been announced.
Even the magazine The Economist is weighing in on the importance of Vancouver’s Chinatown as a historic and very special cultural place deeply rooted in the birth and development of this country. One of the positive things that has happened with the impetus to build condominiums in Chinatown is the rise of a new generation of articulate, smart and savvy young professionals that grew up in or coming to Chinatown, understanding the essence of this place in a very rooted way.
Urbanist Melody Ma is one of those young professionals interviewed by the Economist, and talked about the Chinatown neighbourhood not really changing until after the 2010 Winter Olympics. At that time “the downtown area was forested with new condominiums” and prices have risen by close to 60 per cent in the last three years. While Chinatown was avoided by developers in the past, development applications such as the nine storey luxury apartments proposed for 105 Keefer threaten to undermine Chinatown’s cultural identity. Read on >>
As Curbed.com describes it there is a push for “supertalls” in New York City, those buildings that exceed the 984 foot height limit. As they note “These soaring towers aren’t always popular—many have actively fought against the buildings sprouting along 57th Street and Central Park South, worried that they’ll cause shadowing over the storied park—but it’s hard to argue against their status as marvels of engineering.”Read on >>