When I first heard about the proposal for ‘Transport Pricing’ in the City of Vancouver’s Climate Emergency Action Plan that went to council a few weeks ago, I thought, sorry, that’s a lost battle.
The political capital required to start ‘taxing the road’ is so high, reports that recommend it – like this one – are typically dead on arrival. As elections approach, political leaders jump over each other to reject anything that looks, sounds or smells like a toll. Here’s Bowinn Ma from the NDP, passing along the blunt words from John Horgan (who won the 2017 election by taking tolls off the Port Mann): “I have to be clear: it (congestion pricing) is not in our platform … and John Horgan has stated very clearly today that it would not be supported by our government …”
Not that it matters. Congestion charging as it has been demonstrated in a handful of cities so far, notability Singapore and London, is way out of date – so 20th century. Using gantries, cameras, IED passes and other visibly intrusive technology to establish a geographic cordon for pricing entry and exit for one particular part of a region will never pass the fairness test. Why wouldn’t we include other places – for instance, the North Shore – where congestion is bad and getting worse? (Minimally, there will have to be ‘discussion’ among the municipalities on either side of Lions Gate Bridge.)
Again, so much more political capital required. Add in an equity requirement*, and good luck in getting a majority vote. That’s why so few cities have done it.
So I was impressed when Council, by a bare majority, voted to support the part of the report that had actually recommended Transport Pricing (despite media, and my own, perception of what was being proposed). Staff, having played in this rodeo a few times before (a previous report listed 14 examples), really wanted one key thing from council: ‘Authorize us to develop a road map that will get us to Transport Pricing (TP). Do not take it off the table, ship it off to the region, qualify it into irrelevance or remove any deadline for response’ – and that’s what they got.Read more »