A report from Global News reporter Nadia Stewart, with a headline that distorts the story:
The protest had three dozen people – surely worth a qualified ‘some’ when the headline starts “Vancouverites upset.” But that quibble doesn’t matter when judged against the absence of data and other points of view (like, say, comments from passing cyclists). Importantly, the video story was supplemented in the online print version, where reporter Simon Little provided important information:
Vancouver Park Board manager Dave Hutch says about 93 per cent of Stanley Park Drive is open to vehicles, and that about 70 per cent of parking in the park remains open.
He said after talks with the city’s disability advisory committee, the board also added 10 new handicapped parking spaces.
“We’re seeing that the park and parking is nowhere near capacity this year. The busiest day was in mid August, we had 63 per cent capacity. We would expect about 90 per cent in August,” he told Global News.
Still, impact-wise, the protesters had the visuals and screen time. There have been demanding that Park Drive be restored to two lanes for cars and have all the parking returned – in other words, back to the standards of mid-century Motordom. That’s what we did in the post-war decades, and the roads of Stanley Park were designed accordingly: a transportation system where cars are given most of the space, there are no separated bike lanes (cars and bikes fight it out for priority), parking is provided in excess, and the seawall has to accommodate the crowding of all active transport users. Read more »