May 26, 2016

Dollars and Tunnels and Buses — Oh My!

Two announcements today, one by the Mayors Council and the other by the Provincial Gov’t on transit funding.

The difference that matters is the timeframe — the span of interest, of vision, of commitment.  Short message:  it ain’t even close.

The Mayors want to settle funding for the full 10-year plan, and secure priority access to the massive Federal funding that is on the table.  The Province will only discuss their share of the current Phase 1 money in play — $370 M from the Feds, $246 M from the Province and the remaining $124 M from the region.

Noteworthy ideas from the Mayors:  Increase property tax (rejected by Mayors in earlier discussions).  Return control of Translink to the Mayor’s Council.  Move towards mobility pricing. Try again for a share of carbon tax, or another provincially-controlled revenue source.

The Mayors have proposed to provide 100% of life-cycle operating costs, estimated at $3.9 billion, and the remaining 17% of the Vision’s capital costs, estimated at $1.9 billion over 10 years, by generating new revenues from the:

  1. sale of TransLink surplus property, generating $150 million total towards the Vision.
  2. one-time 2% transit fare increase in 2018, resulting in an average impact of 5¢ – 20¢ per single use product, and generating $106 million, over 10 years
  3. incremental fare revenues from expanded service generating $454 million over 10 years
  4. new Regional Development Cost Charge for Transit, generating $216 million, over 10 years with a representative impact of $1,000 per residential unit, and with the potential to apply benefitting area rate(s), with more analysis and options to explore.
  5. Adjustment of the existing 3% cap on the TransLink Property Tax so it applies to existing owners, with an added annual impact of $4 per average house, generating $339 million over 10 years
  6. allocation of a portion of the region’s federal Gas Tax Fund worth $391 million, over 10 years
  7. introduction of mobility pricing by 2021, generating a net $326 million, over 5-6 years
  8. Vancouver and Surrey will contribute land and other in-kind services to partially off-set costs of the major projects planned in their municipalities.

And suggested the Province contribute:

  • $3 billion over 10-15 years for a 33% share of capital costs of the 10-Year Plan
  • Redistribute and return $50 million in Provincial Carbon Tax subsidy provided to households outside Metro Vancouver back to the region to fund transportation improvements (or another provincially-controlled regional revenue source) 
  • Support for the Mayors’ Council’s efforts to implement regional mobility pricing 
  • Return governance of TransLink to Mayors

While these discussions go on, the Feds are watching, and a long line of others jostle for position at their door.

Update

Report from Frances Bula in the Globe and Mail

The proposal is also the latest salvo between the province and cities as they figure out how they will come up with the $370-million needed to tap into the matching $370-million on the table from the federal government.

Both sides say they need to come to an agreement within weeks or they risk going to the end of the line behind other cities and provinces that have put together their agreements faster.

Report from Jeff Nagle in the Surrey Leader.

 “We feel we’re in striking distance of making this mayors’ plan a reality but we need a partner with the provincial government and so far we haven’t had that,” New Westminster Mayor Jonathan Coté said. “We know there’s going to be substantial federal money available for transit, the type of money we haven’t seen in a generation. My big concern is if the mayors and the province can’t get together to get an agreement in the very near term the reality is I think that’s going to be a lost opportunity for our region.”

Posted in

Support

If you love this region and have a view to its future please subscribe, donate, or become a Patron.

Share on

Comments

Leave a Reply to AnonymousCancel Reply

  1. In London today you have C$~45 billion in current and planned public transit projects on the go for a population only 3.5 times Metro Vancouver’s. The most prevalent project is Crossrail, a new regional express rail service, but there are also many improvements to the Underground and lots of new double decker buses. The engineering of some of the stations and tunnels is very advanced and complex, considering the historical buildings above and spider’s web of services. The funding is both national and local.

    By comparison, we live in a cabin without indoor plumbing near Lund and grow weed to supplement our EI cheques, and make every decision about making a modicum of improvement to our wellbeing needlessly complex.

    1. That’s not the bright side, that’s schadenfreude, and it doesn’t move us any closer to our goals. I’d rather see the Liberals change face on transit, and have the NDP attack them on management issues rather than the fundamental concept that we need transit.

      1. I disagree. The fact that it’ll be delightfully uncomfortable for them (admittedly not without schadenfreude) means they know it’s unpopular compared with the Mayors’ plan. Anyone openly espousing the province’s plan as preferable is less likely to retain their office.

    2. Quick question: Who is the NDP Transportation Critic?(no googling allowed!) What is their position on this funding, on the tunnel replacement, or on Fassbender’s new “Top Priority” of widening Highway 1 beyond Langley? For the amount of furor and the importance to their voting base in the Metro area, the opposition sure is quiet on this file. That scares me more than the Liberals’ continuing incompetence/ambivelance

  2. “The 10-Year Vision is designed to keep this fast- growing Gateway region moving, that will in turn support and deepen trade ties between Canada and Asia.”

    The ‘Confidential’ plan is just the junior partner hustling to take complete control while contributing the least.

    The mayors document also reminds anyone who might see this that, “The Mayors’ Council approves transportation plans prepared by TransLink, which deal with transportation service levels, major capital projects, regional funding and borrowing limits. It also performs limited regulatory oversight functions related to short-term fares, customer survey and complaint processes, sale of major facilities and assets, and director and executive compensation levels.”

    They are basically saying that they are running the show and now they want all the powers to do everything and make all the decisions. Just cough up most of the money and they’ll take it and tell you how to give them what and when.

    1. Since when did cities receive more than a measly 10% of tax revenues collected in their jurisdictions to pay for transit services within their jurisdictions, services that cost many times more than the said 10%? Why shouldn’t they ask for more when senior governments take 90%?

      The next step after the mayors latest financing conniptions would be to grow weed for revenue.

  3. Both sides need to give MORE.

    Mayors need to raise residential parking revenues more AND transit fares, too. 2% is a joke, if 50% is the right figure over 10 years, say 5% a year as the fares are quite low today.

    Both sides protect their turf to buy votes leaving the region squeezed in the middle.

    Car use is far too cheap in the region. We need mobility pricing yesterday, but also need to charge far more for parking and for transit use.

    TransLink needs provincial and local oversight as far too many socialists are on the influential Mayors’ Council and as such the province is rightly rejecting to give up control. Public sector unions are running amok in MetroVan and need to be curbed. Where is this in the discussion, i.e. wages, benefits, pension, hours etc ?

  4. We also need far more subways: under Marine Drive in N-Van, in W-Van, to Stanley Park, in west-end, through E-Van to N-Burnaby then N-Van, south extension to S-Richmond, to UBC, under 41st Ave .. as such the Mayors’ Council’s plan is not bold enough and relies far too much on wobbly (diesel) buses.

Subscribe to Viewpoint Vancouver

Get breaking news and fresh views, direct to your inbox.

Join 7,303 other subscribers

Show your Support

Check our Patreon page for stylish coffee mugs, private city tours, and more – or, make a one-time or recurring donation. Thank you for helping shape this place we love.

Popular Articles

See All

All Articles