From Ken Ohrn:
Kerry Gold writes in the Globe and Mail about the nascent and massive Jericho development.
Her story turns constantly to affordability, and the False Creek South development (near Granville Island) gets a moment in the spotlight.
She seems to have mainly interviewed David Eby (NDP MLA), Robert Howald of Canada Lands and Brian Jackson, City of Vancouver Planner. Glaringly missing is any material from First Nations.
Interesting to me is that City of Vancouver zoning will play a large part in the look, feel, affordability and profitability of this land’s future. Mr. Jackson is, however, quoted as theorizing about a very mixed development.
And again, there is no mention of the enormous opportunity that may arise (pending the plebiscite’s outcome) to extend the Broadway line to Jericho and incorporate transit-oriented development there. This, to my mind, has a major effect on affordability.
So what happens with Jericho if there is no expanded transit? Does the development proceed? Should the cost of additional transit service be a condition of approval – even if it means less of some other public amenity?
If the referendum results in a No vote, should Jericho (and any project in Metro which is designed as a Transit-Oriented Development, or TOD) be put on hold until transit is assured? If not, should the site then be kept at lower density – mainly single-family homes, as allowed under current zoning – to reduce the impact on adjacent neighbourhoods and the road system?
Imagine: Jericho would be cut up into single-family lots, largely car-dependent, sold off at the top end of the real-estate market, with no constraints on foreign purchase, because there is no additional transit service. Or it’s developed at higher densities, but still has to provide a large provision for car parking – because there is no additional transit service.